(영문) 대구지방법원 2021.01.20 2020고단2518

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 2021.01.20 2020고단2518

게임산업진흥에관한법률위반

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for six months, each of the defendants B.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who operates a general game room in the name of “D” on the first floor of Youngcheon-si C and underground, and Defendant B is an employee of “D.”

A game water-related business entity shall not cause any person to engage in gambling or other gambling by using game water, nor leave such person to do so, and no person shall exchange, arrange for exchange or re-purchase of any tangible or intangible result obtained through the use of the game water as a business.

1. On February 5, 2020, the Defendants jointly committed the crime of the Defendants: (a) set up in the game 20-kackers, (b) 20-kackers, (c) 20-kackers, (d) 20-kackers, (e) 20-kackers, and (e) 80-kackers, (e.g., (e) provide customers with access to the game; (b) accumulated the points obtained through the use of the game water, and (c) made the accumulated points available for further use, or (d) sold the accumulated points in cash to others; and (b) made the customers, who acquired the points by transferring the points among the customers, possible to cash the points.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to commit gambling or other speculative acts using game water, and caused the Defendants to do so.

2. On February 2020, the Defendant received a request for a refund of KRW 100,000 from the game room E in the outside toilets of the building where the above game room is located, and issued KRW 90,000 after deducting 10% from the fee, from the outside toilets of the building where the game room is located.

Accordingly, the defendant was engaged in the business of exchanging the results obtained by using game water by customers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement concerning Defendant B’s partial statement of the court of the police in relation to Defendant B, the report on the internal investigation of each police’s statement against the H, F, I, and J on the interrogation protocol of the police in relation to the F’s legal statement G of the witness F of the interrogation protocol of the police in relation to the part of Defendant B’s legal statement (a structure inside and outside the D game site and

유사 판례

-광주지방법원 목포지원 2016.05.20 2015고단1616

-전주지방법원 2016.05.12 2016고단216

-대구지방법원 경주지원 2021.02.16 2020고단805

-울산지방법원 2018.03.13 2017고단4511

-광주지방법원 2018.01.11 2017고단3928