logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2017.05.17 2017고단72
재물손괴등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

(e).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 21, 2016, 2016, the Defendant, “2017 Highest 72,” damaged the Defendant by gathering and destroying the chair, the consignee, and walking the knife installed at the same place, on the ground that he was unable to wear the Defendant at the E cafeteria of the Victim D’s Operation in Yasan-si around 16:00.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the property equivalent to 130,000 won in total of the market price owned by the victim.

On February 11, 2017, the Defendant: (a) assaulted the victim G (46 years of age) who was chilling to, and was chilling to, the female test; and (b) assaulted twice the victim’s left part of the victim’s left part by reason of the following reasons: (c) on February 11, 201, the Defendant 201, at the Do-dong, Daejeon Metropolitan City, Dong-gu, Daejeon Special Metropolitan City (215).

Summary of Evidence

"2017 Highest 72"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. "Submission of a report on internal investigation and an investigation report (related to the submission of a written estimate)" 2017 Height 229;

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of victims;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, the choice of punishment (a point of destruction and a choice of punishment by imprisonment), and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of violence and choice of punishment by imprisonment);

2. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2 and Article 50 of the same Act, and the proviso to Article 42 of the same Act, which increases concurrent crimes;

3. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution of the Punishment of Crimes (Assault) are as follows: Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution of the Punishment of Crimes (hereinafter referred to as the "Act on the Suspension of the Punishment of Crimes") that has no basic area (two months to ten months) (the scope of the recommended punishment) [the scope of the recommendation] of the mitigated area (one month to six months) of the mitigated area (one month), the mitigated area (including one who has been specially mitigated), or the final sentenced to the aggravated punishment of multiple crimes where a significant damage has been restored, the scope of the punishment resulting from the aggravated punishment of multiple crimes: February to January 1 [the decision of the sentence] of the following circumstances and other defendants' age, sex, sex, environment, motive for the crime, motive for the crime, etc.

arrow