The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The defendant of mistake of facts did not have inflicted an injury upon the victims only from the victims.

B. The sentencing of the lower court on the grounds that the sentencing of an unreasonable sentencing (a fine of four million won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. In light of the following circumstances, the victims have credibility in their statements made at the police and the court of first instance, and the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below can be sufficiently recognized that the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victims.

1) From the police to the court below to the court below, the victim C made a statement that he was injured by the defendant's walking over the floor by walking over the clothes of the defendant and suffered injuries, while the defendant and the disputed victim C, and the victim E made a statement that he was faced with drinking faces two times from the defendant, and the defendant was removed. Each statement is consistent with concrete and alternative. 2) While the witness, in Frando, was on a computer in Frando, he did not directly witness the Defendant's assault but did not directly witness the Defendant's assault, he did not directly witness the Defendant's assault, but he stated that "I Dop", "I Dop", "I Dop", "I Dop", "I Dop, I Dop", "I Dop, I Dop", and I see that the victim made a statement that he was not related to the third party's credibility in that he made a statement in that he had no special position.

3 The written diagnosis of the victim C's injury is written as follows: "The parts and distribution of the injury, the degree of the injury, the pulverization No. 2, the written diagnosis of the victim E's injury (the name of disease), "(the name of disease), the base and tension of the bones of the victim E, the base and tension of the (or the injury disease), the base and degree of the injury, and the base and degree of the injury."