beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
The defendant shall be an applicant C with the amount of KRW 1,1650,000 and the amount of compensation.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
"2018 Highest 1434"
1. Around May 8, 2012, the Defendant against the victim C made a false statement to the victim C, who was aware of the victim through the Ginginging club at no more than influence time, stating that “I would make a prompt loan to the victim, with a little interest added thereto.”
However, in fact, the defendant did not have any particular property, and the monthly salary was higher than that of the hospital and the hospital of the punishment, the loan interest for the house in the name of the head, the living expenses, etc., and continued to use the small amount of money from the person who borrowed the money from the victim, so there was no intention or ability to pay the money.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim as such, received from the victim a total of KRW 3 million around May 8, 2012, around KRW 3 million, around June 26, 2012, KRW 4 million around July 16, 2012, and KRW 2 million around August 7, 2012.
2. On May 1, 2013, the criminal defendant against the victim B made a false statement to the victim B, who became aware of the fact through the Ginginging club, that "if the wife B borrowed money in excess of the auction, he/she will prevent the auction, and will receive a loan as security, and he/she will pay the principal and interest at the same time for three months after calculating the interest amount in 50,000 won."
However, the Defendant was unable to carry out the financial situation as stated in Paragraph 1 in the form of withdrawal from the company working, and the Defendant purchased Maho, Gho L, etc. under the name of the Defendant, and purchased Maho, etc. with the interest of KRW 1.5 million per month from the company company, etc., and at the same time purchased Doho, and at the same time created a collateral security of KRW 150 million from the company company with the maximum debt amount exceeding the purchase price of Doho, and thus, the Defendant would have expressed his intent to obtain a loan from the victim as collateral and repay the borrowed amount to the victim.