beta
Text
The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.
Reasons
1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a B rocketing car.
At around 10:00 on March 7, 2016, the Defendant proceeded along a three-lane road in front of the Dcafeteria in Suwon-si C, Suwon-si, with a single-lane from the area of the boundary of the sloping-si.
At that time, since the restricted speed is 60 km at every hour, a person engaged in the driving of motor vehicles is at a point of 60 km, and a person engaged in the driving of motor vehicles has been negligent in operating the steering gear and brakes accurately and neglecting his/her duty of care to safely drive them at a speed of more than 22 km and more than 82 km per hour. The temporary number (F) number of the driving of the E (44 years old, south) that was in violation of the signal, the driver was placed on the left side of the defendant's vehicle, and the driver was f5 years old, driving of E (75 years old, South) that was in violation of the signal, and then the driver was flicker in front of the defendant's vehicle, and then he/she was flicker in front of the victim's vehicle, and suffered the victim's injury, such as salt, tension, tension, etc., by treating the victim I (69 years old, 200 mal.).
2. Determination
(a) The driver of a vehicle driving a private-distance intersection, where traffic is controlled by signal, etc., along with green light, shall, unless there are special circumstances, be sufficient for other vehicles to observe the traffic regulations and take appropriate measures to avoid any collision, and there is no duty of care to take special measures to prevent the occurrence of accidents even in the case of a vehicle driving ahead of another vehicle in violation of the signal, and to ensure that there is no duty of care to take special measures to prevent the occurrence of accidents by forecast even in the case of a vehicle driving ahead of the vehicle driving ahead of the vehicle driving ahead
(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 89Do1774, Feb. 9, 1990). In addition, if a driver had observed a speed limit and continued to do so, a collision would occur after the victim discovered that the driver would be a U.S. driver.