logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 상주지원 2014.08.19 2014고단223
도로교통법위반(음주측정거부)등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by a fine of 2.5 million won.

Defendant

B does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Refusal to measure a noise level) is a driver of a passenger car by obtaining a franchise.

On January 7, 2014, around 21:28, the Defendant driven the said car at a section of about 300 meters from the front side of the “Ecafeteria” to the front side of the “Fcafeteria” in the neighboring area.

At the time, the Defendant: (a) was smelled in a state where he was sniffly fly, and was unable to properly hold his body while snowing, and in relation to parking, the 112 declaration was made three times to G on the condition that he was frightened, that he was frightening, and that he was frightening inside the said vehicle; (b) the police box belonging to the police box of the Seodaemun-gu Police Station, etc., in which he was called up, verified the said vehicle; (c) he was frightening inside the vehicle; (d) the said G made a statement that he was frighting the Defendant at the scene; (d) there was considerable reason to recognize that the said vehicle was driven while under the influence of alcohol, such as on the spot where the said vehicle was stopped, and was accompanied to the above police box at around 21:45 on the same day, and was demanded to respond to the measurement of drinking by inserting the vehicle in a manner of infusing it over four times

Nevertheless, the defendant avoided this and did not comply with the police officer's request for a drinking test without justifiable reasons.

B. When the Defendant received a request for appearance to investigate whether a person was driving in the state of drinking and did not comply with the demand for alcohol measurement as above, on February 10, 2014, the Defendant: (a) stated that “A person who had been driven by the police station at the o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’’

Therefore, the defendant is located in the Dong-dong around 13:30 on February 10, 2014.

arrow