Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 18, 2018, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) around 23:50 on the street in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, as a starting point of view with other people as a parking problem; (b) and (c) under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was lickly fluent by very rough and disorderly words or conducts, or fluencing other persons without good cause, at a place where many people frequent, such as “cruptive flacing flacing flacing”, by taking the influence of alcohol.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at the date and time, at the place, as described in paragraph (1) above, committed an act of disturbance as described in paragraph (1), despite the detention of the police officers, such as a slope D belonging to the Seoul Western Police Station C police box, dispatched to the site after receiving a report of 112, and continued to commit an act of disturbance as described in paragraph (1). The police officers attempted to leave the site by disclosing the Defendant’s personal information and demanding several times, but attempted to leave the site by refusing to disclose his/her personal information, thereby obstructing the police officers’ lawful performance of duties concerning the handling of the reported case by the police officers and the arrest of a flagrant offender by shouldering the above D’s left left-hand buckbbbbbbbbs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (verification of images of a criminal suspect interfering with the performance of official duties);

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on the Punishment of Minor Offenses, Article 3(1)20 (a) of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (a point of disturbing drinking), Article 136(1) (a) (a point of obstructing the performance of official duties) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines, respectively, for the crimes;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the Defendant has no record of obstructing the performance of official duties or of fine exceeding the amount of fine, the Defendant did not focus on any damage caused by each of the crimes of this case, the confession of the crime, and the confession of the crime, and the Defendant was even aware of the police officer who found the victimized police officer.