1. As to KRW 38,967,00 and KRW 30,120,00 among the Plaintiff, the Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 8,847,00 from March 6, 2019.

The Defendant supplied the goods from the Plaintiff on October 31, 2018 divided the amount of KRW 30,120,000 for the goods unpaid to the Plaintiff on two occasions, and paid KRW 15,120,000 until January 31, 2019, and KRW 15,120,000 until March 29, 2019, but prepares and delivers a written rejection of goods prohibition to the effect that the unpaid benefit would be lost at the time of the unpaid payment, other than that, the Plaintiff’s failure to pay the amount of goods equivalent to KRW 8,847,00 from September 2017 to January 2019 may be recognized by taking into account the entire purport of the arguments or all the arguments submitted by the Plaintiff.

(1) The Plaintiff filed an application for a payment order, and the Defendant filed a written reply to the effect that the remainder of the Plaintiff’s objection is merely KRW 8,847,00,00. However, despite the Plaintiff’s filing of an application for a payment order and the remainder of the goods claimed by the Defendant, the Plaintiff did not appear at the date of pleading or submit a written counter-statement to the Plaintiff (= KRW 38,967,000, KRW 847,000, KRW 847,000, and KRW 30,120,000, whichever is later than the date of the payment order, the Defendant is obligated to pay from March 6, 2019 to the date of the delivery of the complaint of this case, which the Plaintiff seeks after the date of the delivery of the complaint of this case, the purport of the claim and the amendment of the cause of the claim, which the Plaintiff seeks after the date of the supply, and the Defendant did not add it to the purport of the claim.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim shall be accepted on the grounds of its reasoning, and it is so decided as per Disposition.