1. In the judgment of the court of first instance, the defendant lot construction corporation loses the amount exceeding the amount ordered to be paid next.

1. Basic facts

A. Status 1 of the parties concerned) The plaintiff is a A apartment located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter referred to as "the apartment of this case").

(2) In order to manage the 13-dong 13-dong 13-dong 13-dong 1067 households, the Defendant Ringle Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Ringle Construction”) is a contractor who directly constructed the apartment of this case as a purchaser of the apartment of this case jointly with the non-party 1-dong 13-dong 13-dong 13-dong 13-dong 13-dong 13-dong 13-dong 13-dong 1-dong 2-dong 1-dong 1-dong 2-dong 1-dong 1-dong 1-dong 1-dong 1-dong 2-dong 1-dong 2-dong 1-dong

(b) On June 2, 2005, the insured on June 2, 2005 between Defendant Seoul Guarantee Insurance and the following table shall be the head of Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government:

1. As indicated in the foregoing, the warranty contract for the repair of defects (hereinafter “instant warranty contract”) was entered into, and all of them were issued by the Defendant Seoul Guarantee Insurance Co., Ltd.

Schedule

1. Notwithstanding the warranty period of June 30, 2005 from June 30, 2005 to June 29, 2006 (1) to June 29, 2006, 743,829,675 from June 30, 2005 to June 29, 2007; 743,829,6753 from June 30, 2005 to June 29, 2007 to June 30, 2005 to June 30 to June 29, 2008; 1,115,74, 5134; 57, 257, 256, 257, 205 to June 25, 207 to June 30, 2005; or to the Defendant’s warranty insurance contract to supplement the warranty insurance or the Defendant’s warranty insurance contract to June 29, 2005.