Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part of the case against Defendant A and the judgment of the court of second instance against Defendant A are reversed.

Defendant

A.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendants 1) and the Defendant and the requester for the attachment order (hereinafter “Defendant”) did not have any intent to commit murder with respect to the victim’s Z, and there was no intention to commit robbery with respect to the Defendant, the J, and robbery. There was no fact that the Defendant, in advance, knew or planned murder with respect to the murder.

B) The sentence (a life imprisonment, etc.) sentenced by the lower court to the Defendant is too unreasonable.

2) Defendant I’s misunderstanding of the facts as to murder and abandonment of the body (related to murder and abandonment of robbery) in the instant facts charged, there was no conspiracy with A and J as to murder and abandonment of the body among the instant facts charged, and there was no intention to commit the aforementioned crimes.

B) The sentence sentenced by the lower court to the Defendant (15 years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

3) Defendant JA’s misunderstanding of the facts (the commission of robbery) (the commission of murder) and the commission of murder during the robbery of this case, there was no conspiracy with Defendant A, and there was no intention to commit murder.

B) The sentence sentenced by the lower court to the Defendant (15 years of imprisonment, etc.) is too unreasonable.

4) Defendant KA’s misunderstanding of the legal principles and misapprehension of the legal principles did not have conspired with A and robbery, and there was no probability for the victim AI to incur an injury, and the above victim’s wife does not constitute an injury in the crime of robbery.

B) The sentence sentenced by the lower court to the Defendant (three years and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

5) Defendant HA had no conspiracy to commit a crime of robbery with A, K, and robbery, and there was no intention to aid and abetting that the crime was easily committed.

B) The sentence sentenced by the lower court to the Defendant (three years of suspended sentence for two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. Prosecutor 1) misunderstanding of the facts and misapprehension of the legal principles (not guilty of Defendant H), the lower court stated in the investigative agency that Defendant A and K conspired in advance with Defendant H and the disposal of stolen property in the court.