logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2013.09.26 2013고단348
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Dowing Vehicles) and the Road Traffic Act (Non-accidents) are those who are engaged in driving cars with C salary and franchis.

On April 29, 2013, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle around 20:50, and got the front of the tent located in the diapologe at the time of the macronomy, into the ground cell protection area from the on-site bank.

The above road is a one-lane road in which a lot of street lights are not installed in the vicinity, and it was difficult at night around the night. In such a case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle by ensuring a sufficient safety distance to cope with the accident, securing a sufficient safety distance to avoid the accident, and accurately operating the brake and steering gear.

Nevertheless, the Defendant found the victim D(M 30 years old)’s EM 3 car driven in the same lane while driving the vehicle as it was while neglecting the duty at the time of the preceding week, which was going through the same lane, late, and did not stop, but did not stop, and received the back part of the above SM3 vehicle on the right-hand side of the above cargo, and caused the victim D to suffer erode and tension in need of treatment for about two weeks, and the victim F(11 years old), who was driving the above vehicle, suffered a scop and tension in need of treatment for about two weeks, and at the same time, did not take measures such as rescue or escape of the victim at the scene, even though the above vehicle was 5,35,103 won, and did not escape from the scene.

2. A violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) provides that the Defendant is under the influence of alcohol at a 0.071% of blood alcohol concentration on April 30, 2013 when he/she was under the influence of alcohol at a 0.071%.

arrow