1. The Defendant shall start on June 6, 2014 with respect to the Plaintiff A’s 394,800,000 won, 169,200,000 won, and each of the above amounts.

1. Basic facts

A. On March 201, the Defendant succeeded to the rights and duties of the Housing Establishment Promotion Committee composed of the reconstruction improvement project association that completed the registration of incorporation with the authorization of establishment from the Gu and the Gu and the Gu and the Si and the Gu and the Si and the Gu and the Gu and the Si and the Gu and the Gu and the Gu and the Gu and the

B. Around November 2005, the C Apartment Housing Establishment Promotion Committee entered into a service contract with D and C Apartment Housing Reconstruction Business Specialized Management Affairs.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant service contract”);

6. Contract unit price: 47,000 won per square meter on the total floor area of new construction (excluding value-added tax);

7. Contract amount: The contract amount shall be determined by multiplying the total floor area to be newly constructed after authorization for project implementation by the above-mentioned unit price.

8. Period of service: Terms and conditions of the housing maintenance service contract and specialized management service contract from the date of contract to the date of dissolution of the partnership.

2. The timing and method of payment of service charges to be paid by Gap to Eul shall be as follows:

Provided, That the cost of services for which the time prior to the selection of the contractor arrives shall be paid when the contractor or financial institution can raise funds.

Down payment: 20% of the first intermediate payment at the time of the contract: 20% of the second intermediate payment at the time of the designation of a rearrangement zone: 20% at the time of authorization for establishment: 20% at the time of authorization for establishment: 10% of the remainder at the time of approval for establishment: 10% at the time of occupancy

C. After the Defendant’s establishment, E’s representative E closed the company D and established F, and the Defendant concluded a service contract with the content similar to that of the previous, on March 25, 2013 regarding the specialized management of F and C apartment reconstruction business.

The plaintiffs, on May 30, 2014, as Daegu District Court Decision 2014TTT1631, the claim amount of plaintiff A was KRW 394,80,000,00, and the claim amount of plaintiff B was KRW 169,20,000, against the defendant of defendant D.