(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2013.06.13 2013고정436

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2013.06.13 2013고정436

교통사고처리특례법위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 26, 2012, the Defendant driving a Csi on May 26, 2012, and driving a five-lane road in front of the Changcheon Tri-dong, Mapo-gu, Seoul, Seoul, at a speed of about 10km from the new village to the red-interest slope.

Since there is an intersection where a signal, etc. is installed, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to live well with the signal, etc. and to drive the motor vehicle safely according to its signals.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received from the victim D (the aged 31) who was driven by the signal on the opposite line to the right side of the E-rayed vehicle driven by the victim D (the aged 31) who was driven by the signal on the opposite line to the right side of the vehicle due to the negligence in contravention of the straight-on signal of the vehicle, and received the part back to the right side of the said taxi, and followed the victim D with approximately two weeks of treatment, and suffered from the victim F (the aged 30) who took part of the damaged vehicle for about two weeks of treatment, the injury of the e-rayed base, etc. requiring approximately two weeks of treatment, and suffered from the victim G (the aged 30) the injury of the e-rayed base, etc. requiring approximately two weeks of treatment, and the injury of the e-rayed base, etc. requiring approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Reports on traffic accidents, reports on the occurrence of traffic accidents, and reports on requests for appraisal;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (2) 2 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents in the Selection of Punishment, and Article 2

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act or more;

참조조문

유사 판례

-광주지방법원 순천지원 2015.02.06 2014고단2055

-광주지방법원 장흥지원 2020.05.28 2019고단320

-인천지방법원 2013.04.25 2013고단1061

-전주지방법원 2016.10.25 2016고단1171

-춘천지방법원 영월지원 2014.01.17 2013고단564