The defendant shall pay KRW 15,00,000 to the plaintiff as well as 5% per annum from April 10, 2015 to September 1, 2015, and the next day.

Facts of recognition

The plaintiff completed the marriage report with C on October 24, 2006 and has two children (209 and 2012).

The defendant knew that C was married, and sent letters demanding C to communicate with C, such as letters containing the content of C and love from around December 2013. On December 9, 2013, the defendant sent letters demanding C to communicate with C as C did not communicate.

After that, the defendant maintained contact with C, and lived with C on December 23, 2014, while living together with C in Busan and Ulsan. At the time, the defendant received 8,000,000 won from the working place where he worked and appropriated it for living expenses, etc.

C (hereinafter “the deceased”) died at the studio located in Ulsan, which was residing on January 2, 2015.

(The reason for death shall be presumed to be suicide). [The reason for death shall be presumed to be suicide] The act of a third party, in principle, of infringing on the rights of the spouse and causing emotional distress to the spouse by interfering with the common life of the married couple and causing the failure of the married couple by participating in the other party's common life and causing the failure of the married couple's common life. The third party's act of infringing on the spouse's common life equivalent to the essence of marriage or interfering with the maintenance thereof and infringing on the spouse's rights as the spouse.

(2) Article 840 Subparag. 1 of the Civil Act provides that “illegal act” shall be construed as an “illegal act” under Article 840 Subparag. 1 of the Civil Act, which includes any act that is not faithful to the duty of good faith as a spouse, and shall be construed as an “illegal act” under Article 840 Subparag. 1 of the same Act as a broad concept rather than the so-called “an ordinary position.” In addition, the degree and circumstances should be considered in consideration

(See Supreme Court Decision 92Meu68 delivered on November 10, 1992, etc.). According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is the deceased.