A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

From November 20, 2012 to November 24, 2012, the Defendant: (a) 42 television 42 at which the victim D, who had been installed in the telecom in the Felel located in Ma, had the right of share of 1/2; (b) system air-conditioning 42; (c) computer 42; (d2; (d) 42; (d) air-conditioning 42; (c) bathing rooms, etc.; (d2); (d2); (d2); (d2); (d2); (c) air-conditioning 42; (d2); (d2); (42); (42); (42); (42); (42); (d2); (c) air-conditioning 42; (d2); and (30); (5); and (10); (10); and (3) 32; and (3) H property shock from the city.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The legal statement of witness D (which is made on the fifth trial date), and the witness I's legal statement (which is made on the sixth trial date);

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the accused by the prosecution (including the D substitute part);

1. Protocol concerning the examination of suspect of G;

1. Statement of each police statement to D, I, and J;

1. Certification of the full payment of sale price;

1. A certified copy of each real estate register;

1. Determination of an order to deliver each real estate, consent to a delivery of real estate, and a written transfer of corporeal movables;

1. Each photograph and damaged photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the details of goods damaged by the complainant;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 32(1)3 and 32(2), and 25(3)3 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Lawsuits, etc. of Application for Compensation (the scope of liability for compensation is unclear, and thus, it is not reasonable to issue an order for compensation in the criminal procedure of this case) is that the Defendant stolen multiple goods, such as the instant television, and the victim’s degree of damage therefrom, etc., the nature of the offense and the Defendant’s liability cannot be deemed

However, in light of the circumstances leading up to the theft of this case, there are reasonable grounds for considering the circumstances, and the defendant is the victim.