beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Defendant
In an indivisible final and conclusive judgment which found a number of criminal facts in the relationship of concurrent deliberation scope of this court against A and sentenced one punishment as guilty, where it is deemed that there exist grounds for request for retrial only for a part of the facts constituting a crime, the decision to commence retrial has to be made on the whole of the judgments. However, since the effect of the decision to commence retrial is limited to the facts constituting a crime for which there is no grounds for retrial under the nature of the system of retrial, which is a means of emergency relief, the effect of the decision to commence retrial is included in that part in the formal subject of a trial, the retrial court cannot reverse the conviction by re-examination. However, since the new sentencing should be imposed on that part, only the scope necessary for sentencing can
(1) As to the crime of injury to Defendant A, which has no ground for retrial among the judgment subject to a retrial, is to be deliberated only to the extent necessary for sentencing. As such, the scope of crimes of injury to Defendant A, which had no ground for retrial, among the judgment subject to a retrial, should be limited to the extent necessary for sentencing.
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A,
1. On November 4, 2010, the victim E (n, 48 years of age) and the husband’s fighting in Jongno-gu Seoul Jongno-gu Jlla 603 on November 4, 2010, the victim led the victim, her two descendants, and the victim’s her leg was divided into two legs, and the victim’s her leg was classified into the victim’s leg, and the victim’s psychotropic damage was caused by the need to know the number of days of treatment.
2. On June 18, 201, the mother of the Defendant in Jongno-gu, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 502, brought about the right hand hand hand handbling, bucking, etc. to the victim for approximately three weeks of medical treatment on the ground that the recording machine, which the victim had been installed in his/her place, did not return to the right hand hand of the victim or the victim, was not returned.
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant's legal statement; 1.1.