(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2016.10.25 2015가단107496

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2016.10.25 2015가단107496

청구이의

Text

1. On February 3, 2015, Suwon District Court Branch Decision 2015Na2458 against the Defendant’s Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company that manufactures and distributes medical devices, and the Defendant is a company that manufactures and distributes medical devices.

B. On January 10, 2014, the Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded a gold-type production contract (hereinafter “instant contract”) with the content that the Defendant would produce and deliver the gold-type to the Plaintiff, and that the amount of the production would be KRW 11,386,100.

Since then, the defendant supplied the above gold punishment to the plaintiff, and 1,100,000 won was added for the maintenance of the above gold punishment.

C. The Plaintiff paid to the Defendant KRW 7,970,270 on January 10, 2014, KRW 1,500,00 on May 5, 2011 of the same year, KRW 1,915,830 on January 12, 2015, and KRW 1,10,000 on May 11, 2016.

On January 19, 2015, the Defendant: (a) filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff for the production of gold surcharges of “CBR-100S” and “BR-300” separately from the instant contract from the Plaintiff on April 19, 2014; and (b) on May 3, 2015, the Defendant manufactured the said gold surcharges (hereinafter “the instant gold surcharges”) and supplied them to the place designated by the Plaintiff; (c) on the ground that the Defendant received the payment of the unpaid production charges of KRW 1,915,830; (d) 1,100,00,000, total production charges of this case; (e) KRW 10,115,830; and (e) KRW 10,100,00,000; and (e) requested the Plaintiff to pay the outstanding production charges of KRW 2015,2458, Feb. 3, 2015; (e) the Plaintiff received the instant performance recommendations decision within KRW 201315,15,205.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, significant facts in this court, Gap evidence 1, 5, Eul evidence 1 to 3, and 8 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's assertion 1 of the parties concerned is asserted.

유사 판례

-광주지방법원 2015.04.02 2014가합55798

-부산지방법원 2017.04.28 2016나7958

-수원지방법원 2017.11.22 2016가단40404

-인천지방법원 2017.12.06 2016나14478

-수원지방법원안산지원 2016.01.22 2012가단38155