logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.05.09 2018고정182
상해
Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000 and by a fine of KRW 700,000, respectively.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants are in line with the NAN line.

1. Defendant A, on October 14, 2017, at around 00:48, the Defendant: (a) in the toilet “D Frequency D” located in Busan B, Busan, the Defendant: (b) was a victim B, who was fluored with a phomatic call that the Defendant was fluoring in the restaurant, and was found to have been fluored.

The injury was inflicted on the number of days of treatment, such as blicking the victim's buck with the hand floor on the ground that the victim is bad, and blicking the face by drinking, making the victim blick in both sides of the body.

2. Defendant B, at the time and place as set forth in paragraph (1) for the foregoing reasons, did not inflict an injury on the victim A for the treatment days, such as flabing flabs and flabs, sculing the victim’s face, making the victim’s face flab in drinking, making the victim’s flab, and making the flab.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the Defendants

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment for a crime;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, applicable to the order of provisional payment;

arrow