logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.02.16 2015고합210
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(강간)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

The defendant shall be ordered to complete a sexual assault treatment program for 120 hours.

(e).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From August 5, 2014, the Defendant took advantage of around May 10, 2015 among the victims D (n, 15 years of age) and deadly from around August 5, 2015. The Defendant was aware of the fact that the victim was the Defendant’s friendship F (n, 19 years of age) and the right of the victim, and had an undecent appraisal for the victim, etc.

1. On July 21, 2015, the Defendant committed injury on July 21, 2015: (a) around 23:00, at a park located in the Gu, Jindo-si, Jindo-si; (b) the victim had already heard the fact that he had sexual intercourse with the Defendant’s friendship F and had sexual intercourse with the Defendant before he she she she she she she her; (c) the victim she she she she she was flick, and the victim she she she was her face at several times with her hand; (d) the victim’s side she she was several times with the victim’s back, and (e) when the victim’s she she was flick with plastic boom, the victim suffered injury, such as the removal of the closed boom, which requires three weeks of medical treatment.

2. On July 22, 2015, the Defendant committed a violation of the Act on the Protection of Juveniles from Sexual Abuse (rape-rape) on July 22, 2015, and the Defendant’s assault, such as (i) around 03:00 on July 22, 2015 and (ii) around 03:00 on July 22, 2015, and (iii) even though the victim gets out of the assault, she is her sexual intercourse with the victim.

After having become aware of the victim by stating to the purport that “,” the victim was born to the Hel 402 located in the Gu G due to Changwon-si.

At the above body at the time and place, the defendant reported that the victim was locked and locked from the body, and exceeded the victim's clothes, and made both arms and sexual intercourse once.

As such, the Defendant, a juvenile, has sexual intercourse by taking advantage of the victim’s non-competence status.

A prosecutor initially indicted for the purpose of violating the Act on the Protection of Children’s Juveniles from Sexual Abuse on the 8th trial day, but modified the facts charged in the same manner as the facts charged on the 8th trial day, made a violation of the Act on the Protection of Children’s Juveniles from Sexual Abuse on the name of the crime, and applied the Act to the name of the crime.

arrow