logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.10.19 2017고단2505
폭행
Text

All prosecutions against the Defendants are dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that Defendant B is a supplier of C and Defendant A is not aware of each other of the persons who are supplied to D delivery employees for each Et.

A. On May 18, 2017, Defendant A: (a) was sent to the victim B (52 tax) and his business partner in the E Eart in front of the Eart in Ansan-si, Ansan-si on May 13:10, 2017; and (b) was tried by Defendant A by her hand to determine why the victim would be supplied to other business partners; (c) the victim’s buck with her head, and assaulted the victim by her head.

B. Defendant B, at the time and place set forth in the above paragraph 1, committed assault against the victim by cutting down the victim A (V, 51) by selling for the foregoing reasons.

2. Determination

(a) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act;

B. The Defendants, the victims, submitted each written application for punishment to the effect that they were not subject to punishment after the prosecution of the instant case.

(c)

Judgment dismissing Public Prosecution: Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act

arrow