logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2012.08.17 2011가단67239
손해배상(기)
Text

1. On the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant),

A. Defendant B: (a) from March 15, 2011, 4,000 Won and its equivalent:

B. Defendant C shall be 7,000.

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and counterclaim shall also be deemed a principal lawsuit and counterclaim.

1. Basic facts

A. On May 15, 1997, the Plaintiff joined a gardening company, which is a partner company in the Asan Factory of Defendant Hyundai Motor Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Hyundai Motor Co., Ltd.”), and the gardening company changed to the operation industry, a well-beinger, a well-beinger, and a well-beinger, etc., and the Plaintiff was also changed to its affiliation. From July 1, 2008, the Plaintiff was subject to the changed E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “E”) and was working in the Asan Factory of Defendant Hyundai Hyundai Motor Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Hyundai Motor”), and was subject to disciplinary action on September 30, 2010 while serving in the Asan Factory of Defendant Hyundai Motor.

B. Defendant Hyundai Motor Vehicle is a company that carries out automobile manufacturing business, such as Sota and Abdolur, in Ulsan, Agsan, and Jeonju, with its head office located in Seocho-dong 231, Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

C. Defendant D established E on July 1, 2008 and closed its business on November 4, 2010, and Defendant D was the president of E, and E was in charge of internal PDI process as an in-house subcontractor in an in-house factory of the Defendant Hyundaij.

Defendant B and Defendant C were employees of E who were employed in the same workplace as the Plaintiff, and were in the position of each chief and the head of each group.

[Ground for recognition] Facts that there is no dispute or does not clearly dispute, the purport of the whole argument

2. The part against Defendant B and C in the principal claim

가. 인용하는 부분 (1) 인정사실 ㈎ 피고 B은 2009. 4. 18.(토) 11:44경 직장 동료이자 자신의 아내 F과 친하게 지내는 원고에게, ‘나 A 좋아 사랑해’라는 문자 메시지를 보냈다.

㈏ 피고 C은 2009. 6. 18. 00:52경 술을 마시고 늦은 밤에 원고에게 전화하여, 원고의 거듭된 거절의사에도 “이봐 거기 가서 자면 안될까 ”, “거기 가서 자도 되잖아”, “나 거기 가서 잘 테니까 그런 줄 알아”라는 등으로 원고의 집에 가서 자고 싶다는 이야기를 하였다.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts that there is no dispute or is not clearly disputed, Gap 1-29 evidence, the chairman of the National Human Rights Commission of this Court, the president of the Korea Labor Welfare Corporation, and the chief of the Daejeon District Prosecutors' Office.

arrow