The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination of whether the Defendant committed each of the instant crimes even though he/she was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for not less than one year and six months on February 20, 2013 and was arrested for each of the instant crimes on April 8, 2014 after the execution of the instant punishment was completed, he/she committed anotherless type of crime, destruction, assault, intrusion upon residence, intrusion upon a structure, etc., and even he/she was sentenced to a fine each of the instant crimes at several times, and the Defendant was punished or prosecuted for anless act since 2010; the Defendant did not appear to have made efforts to recover damage; on the other hand, there were unfavorable circumstances, such as the confession of each of the instant crimes; on the other, the Defendant committed all of the instant crimes; favorable circumstances, such as the degree of damage caused by fraud and damage to police officers due to obstruction of performance of official duties; imprisonment with prison labor for not more than six months; imprisonment with prison labor for not more than one year or six months; imprisonment with prison labor for less than six months from the final sentencing guidelines applied by the lower court; imprisonment with prison labor for less than one year to six months (16 months or six months, basic types of fraud types of fraud.

3. The judgment below is reversed in accordance with Article 364(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is well-grounded, and the following judgment is rendered after pleading.

Criminal facts

The summary of the facts charged and the summary of the evidence recognized by this court shall be as follows.