logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.08.24 2018나2007922
청구이의
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. Until this judgment becomes final and conclusive, a notary public shall, on January 27, 2015, act on behalf of the law firm.

Reasons

On June 19, 2001, the relevant medical corporation A (hereinafter referred to as the "debtor") operated a convalescent hospital in Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-si.

The director with the representative authority of the debtor was E from the time of the debtor's establishment to August 8, 2015, but was changed to F on August 8, 2015.

E operates G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “G”), H Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “H”), and I Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “I”), and conducted real estate development projects through each of the above companies.

In order to lend and secure funds to G, H, and I from July 201 to February 2012, the Defendant, as indicated in the following table, issued a promissory note amounting to KRW 3.6 billion in total (hereinafter “instant promissory note”) with M as a joint issuer, who was working as the representative director of H and G, H, and I at the time of H, H, and I as shown in the following table, and a notary public drafted a authentic deed of a promissory note stating the purport of recognizing compulsory execution in a law firm non-exclusive personal register.

No. 2.30 billion won on September 14, 201, No. 2. 2.300 billion won on August 201, 201; Defendant 2. 1.3 billion won on September 201, 201; Defendant 2.3 billion won on September 14, 201; Defendant 2. 1.3 billion won on October 201, 201 on October 36, 201; and Defendant 1.3 billion won on October 16, 201 on October 36, 201; and Defendant 2. 1.3 billion won on October 5, 201, Defendant 201 on October 24, 201.

arrow