1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The relationship between the parties 1) The Plaintiff and the deceased C (inception to dysane and death on January 17, 2009, hereinafter “the deceased”).

(2) The Defendant, as an attorney-at-law, represented the F’s complaint in the relevant criminal case as follows. The Defendant, as an attorney-at-law, was a legal spouse, was D (C) and E (C) with his child, and F and G, as a child.

B. Around the end of 2011, F and G filed a complaint against the Plaintiff with the investigative agency on the charge that “the Plaintiff had arbitrarily excavated the deceased’s remains and concealed them after having excavated the deceased’s remains, in a conflict between his/her children’s estate inheritance, etc., without any legitimate authority.” However, on January 31, 2012, the Plaintiff was subject to a disposition of non-guilty from the former District Prosecutors’ Office (No. 201 type No. 26555) (No. 201 type No. 26555). The appeal was accepted, and the Plaintiff was indicted with the Jeonju District Court on July 2, 2012 for the charge of the excavation of the deceased’s remains, and on October 10, 2012, the Jeonju District Court (No. 2012 type No. 1597) (No. 2010Da1597) rendered a judgment of innocence to the appellate court.

In other words, the prosecutor appealed against this, but the Supreme Court (2013Do9250) dismissed the appeal on October 24, 2013.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 4, 5, 8, 12, and 31, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Judgment on the plaintiff's assertion

A. The summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion is false in collusion with F, G, and the investigative agency and the full bench that “the Plaintiff arbitrarily excavated the decedent’s graves managed by F, G, and then buried the decedent’s remains and buried them.”