logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 충주지원 2016.07.20 2016고정14
공인중개사의업무및부동산거래신고에관한법률
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B A A certified broker who engages in the business of mediating real estate in the name of "E-authorized Brokerage Office" in the Da of Chungcheongbuk-gun, and the defendant A is the husband of B and is the assistant of the above E-authorized Brokerage Office.

1. No person who is an employee or executive of a certified broker A, an affiliated brokerage assistant, or an agent or executive of a brokerage business entity shall receive money and valuables in excess of the fees or actual expenses under the relevant provisions under any pretext, such as a case, donation, etc.;

Nevertheless, on July 3, 2012, Defendant A entered into a contract with Defendant B to purchase KRW 1643 square meters in three lots, such as H, etc. owned by the seller, at the E-official brokerage office located in Chungcheong-gun E-gun, a brokerage assistant by Defendant A, for the purchase of KRW 97,00,000,000, in which the buyer F purchases KRW 66,000,000 from the seller’s I, and KRW 1,019,70 [1,000,000, amounting to KRW 873,000,000 equivalent to the statutory commission for the contract (0.9%) and KRW 54,000,000 equivalent to the statutory commission for the contract (0.9%) and KRW 102,708,000,000,000 for each fee]

2. Defendant B received money and valuables in excess of the commission or actual cost under the relevant laws and regulations with respect to the brokerage business of Defendant B, at the date, at the place, and at the date, at the above paragraph 1.1.

(The Defendants asserted that the above KRW 1,700,000 was received after agreement with the buyer, including the actual expenses incurred for each sales contract, in addition to the statutory fees.

However, each of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence, namely, ① the Defendants asserted that the expenses incurred in each of the above sales contracts are food entertainment expenses and vehicle fuel expenses, etc., but the aforementioned expenses are specific places of use and amount of use.

arrow