logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2014.12.18 2014고단1540
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who drives Oralba.

On June 30, 2014, the Defendant driven the above Oral Ba, which was around 13:30 on June 30, 2014, and moved to the right bypass from the parking lot exit of the Bosung-gun, Bosung-gun, Bosung-gun, the 26 Bosung-gun, Bosung-gun.

Since there are two sides of the entrance, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to check the safety of course by checking well the right of way prior to the right of way and then to make a right of way.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to bypass the front left by the Defendant, and did not find the victim D(W, 53 years old) driving on the left side of the direction of the Defendant’s running on the left side, and did not discover the victim’s motor vehicle E(W, 53 years old) driving on the right side of the direction, and had the victim go beyond the floor with the front wheels of the Defendant’s right side.

On July 4, 2014, around 10:20 on July 4, 2014, the Defendant caused the death of a victim who was receiving treatment from a Gwangju Korean Hospital located in Gwangjunam-gu, Nam-gu, Gwangju, due to brain liver function.

Summary of Evidence

Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the defendant's legal statement, actual condition investigation report, field photo, death examination report

1. Article 3 (1) of the relevant Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 (Selection of Depository Punishment)

2. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Consideration, such as the fact that there are extenuating circumstances in light of the developments of the traffic accident, the fact that the automobile liability insurance was subscribed to and agreement with the bereaved family members of the victim, and the fact that

arrow