The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged in this case is operating Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

On June 17, 2011, the Defendant distributed a pre-contract box containing women’s face pictures and “pre-contracts, 24 hours’ off, and D” on the roads around the subway zone located in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and openly distributed a leaflet box, which is a media harmful to juveniles, at a place where the public passes, at a place where the public passes.

2. In a judgment, the burden of proof for the criminal facts prosecuted in a criminal trial is to be borne by the public prosecutor, and the conviction is to be based on the evidence of probative value that makes the judge feel true beyond a reasonable doubt. Therefore, if there is no such evidence, the suspicion of guilt is between the defendant, even if there is no such evidence.

Even if there is no choice but to judge the interests of the defendant.

(2) According to the reasoning of the judgment below, the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles as to the facts charged in this case, and by misapprehending the legal principles as to the facts charged in this case, the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles as to the facts charged in this case. The court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles as to the facts charged in this case, thereby affecting the conclusion of the judgment, as otherwise alleged in the ground of appeal. It did not err by misapprehending the legal principles as to the facts charged in this case, as otherwise alleged in the ground of appeal. It did not err by misapprehending the legal principles as to the grounds of appeal.