beta
Text
1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff, the appointed party) and the appointed party (Counterclaim Plaintiff) jointly and severally against the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) 2,607.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On June 20, 201, the Plaintiff entered into a construction contract with the Defendant Company on the construction of the third floor building in Gwangju-si E Office (hereinafter “instant construction”), setting the construction period as KRW 3 months from the commencement date, ② the construction cost as KRW 135,00,000 (including value-added tax, KRW 148,50,000). The designated representative director C of the Defendant Company, the auditor of the Defendant Company, and D, who is the representative director of the Defendant Company, affixed the personal seal to the contractor of the instant construction contract, along with the indication “individual”.
(11) On June 22, 201, the Plaintiff paid to the Defendant Company KRW 13,50,00, and KRW 1,350,00 on July 1, 201, and KRW 3,58,500 on September 6, 201, and KRW 568,50 on value-added tax, and KRW 10,00 on September 8, 201, and KRW 10,000 on KRW 10,000 on September 7, 2011, and KRW 0,000, KRW 10,000 on KRW 10,00 on September 7, 200, KRW 200, KRW 10,00 on KRW 1,59,00 on September 1, 201, and KRW 159,00 on Value-Added Tax; and
C. Meanwhile, when the Plaintiff pays the construction cost of KRW 10,000,000 on February 21, 2012, the Defendant Company and the designated parties (hereinafter the Defendants) promised to be responsible for and complete all the process so that the Plaintiff may apply for a completion inspection before March 10, 2012, and borrowed KRW 10,000,000 from the Plaintiff separately from the construction cost on the same day.
This building was approved on June 12, 2012.
[Ground for Recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 3, Gap evidence 4, Gap evidence 5, and Gap evidence 8]
2. Determination on the main claim
A. Compensation for damages due to the failure of construction, erroneous construction, defects and delay of construction: The Appointor’s written contract of this case as seen in the above recognition of KRW 21,972,791.