Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

"2019 Highest 478"

1. Fraud;

A. On July 9, 2018, the Defendant committed fraud against the victim D in the G mobile phone agency of the trade name “F” located in E at E at the time of debate on July 9, 2018, with the victim D having the appearance of a new condition.

If the person in advance pays the price of the mobile phone which he/she opened with two children, he/she will treat the terminal price at zero won and return the price of the prepaid terminal within two to three months.

“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, the above conditions did not exist, and the money received from the injured person as the price for the short term was intended to be used as the sales operating expenses. The Defendant had no intention or ability to return the price for the pre-paid mobile phone within two to three months, because the business difficulties of mobile phone burial at the time occur due to the business difficulties of mobile phone burial, and the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to return the price for the pre-paid mobile phone within two to three months.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 3,307,130 in total from the victim, around August 3, 2018, including KRW 580,130, and KRW 2,727,00 on August 7, 2018, from the victim, to H account in the name of the Defendant.

B. On October 2, 2018, the Defendant against the victim J is raising a new condition to the victim J at the place described in the above paragraph A.

If the mobile phone opens through a mobile phone after changing the mobile phone device, and advance payment of the terminal price of the opened mobile phone is made, the terminal price shall be treated at zero won, and the advance payment shall also be returned within two to three months.

“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, the above conditions did not exist, and the money received from the injured person as the price for the short term was intended to be used as the sales operating expenses. The Defendant had no intention or ability to return the price for the pre-paid mobile phone within two to three months, because the business difficulties of mobile phone burial at the time occur due to the business difficulties of mobile phone burial, and the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to return the price for the pre-paid mobile phone within two to three months.

The Defendant is identical to this.