The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment without labor for not less than 10 months, 2 years of suspended execution, 160 hours of community service, 40 hours of course) that the court below made is unreasonable.

2. It is reasonable to respect the sentencing conditions compared to the judgment of the first instance court, if there is no change in the sentencing conditions, and the sentencing of the first instance court does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion.

(See Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260 Decided July 23, 2015). Based on the foregoing legal doctrine, the lower court determined the sentence by taking into account the following circumstances (such as the degree of negligence between the Defendant and the victim, the degree of negligence between the Defendant and the victim, and the bereaved family member) as stated in its reasoning.

In addition to the circumstances indicated by the lower court, no new circumstance exists to change the sentence of the lower court in the trial, and even considering the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive and means of crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentencing of the lower court does not seem to have exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion because it is too unfasible, even if the lower court’s sentencing was considered in light of all of the conditions of sentencing as

The prosecutor's assertion is without merit.

3. The prosecutor's appeal of conclusion is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.