The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (4 months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment is based on the following facts: (a) the Defendant led to confession and reflects on his own crime; and (b) the Defendant has no other criminal records not only twice a fine; (c) the nature of each of the crimes of this case is recognized as having no other criminal records; (d) the crime of false accusation is an offense which impedes the proper exercise of the State’s criminal justice power and seriously infringes on the legal stability of the person under consideration; and (e) the crime of false accusation, which causes damage to a forced indecent act, is in need of strict punishment; and (e) there is no change of circumstances that may otherwise determine the age, sex, family relation, criminal record, motive, means, and consequence of the crime; and (e) the punishment imposed by the court below is too unreasonable, considering all the circumstances, including the punishment imposed by the court below, such as the age, sex, criminal records, criminal records, the motive, means, and consequence of the crime.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so ordered as per Disposition.