logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.06.03 2015고합323
특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. The Defendant, as an operator of F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “F”), a vessel sales broker in Busan Jung-gu E building 102, in Busan Jung-gu, to the effect that “150 tons of a vessel would be purchased from the Victim G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “victim”) and that “an appropriate vessel would be colored.” On May 201, the Defendant was delivered a vessel purchase intent to the effect that “the appropriate vessel would be changed.” On July 10, 2013, the Defendant had already been requested by the Japanese private affiliated company I (hereinafter “I”) of H (hereinafter “H”) to sell the instant vessel to the damaged company.

On June 25, 2014, the Defendant has good faith with the damaged company at the F Office around F Office.

After notifying the purport that the order was 19 years mountain, the vessel was sent to the damaged company by e-mail with the introduction data on the vessel. On June 26, 2014, the instant vessel entered as if the vessel was built in 1995, and sent by deducting part of the data confirming the fact that the actual production year of the Crain was 1984. On July 20, 2014, the vessel purchaser of the victimized company was called to K to enter into a contract in Japan.

I sought understanding as to whether other persons attempt to die at a higher price.

Japan's U.S. owner was too reduced;

The contract will be concluded as soon as possible.

“Is the vessel built in 1995” in demanding purchase.

“Absing to K’s physical foods, she called her her friend in 1995,” and explained that on June 2014, K visited F Office at F Office at F Office at F Office at the end of that year, she was 1995 for the date of the building of the vessel at home.

On July 22, 2014, F and H concluded a sales contract for the instant vessel (hereinafter “instant sales contract”) containing the content that “the instant vessel was built around October 1995” (hereinafter “instant sales contract”).

Accordingly, the injured company that believed that the age of 19 years is the 19 years is the case between F and F on the same day.

arrow