(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2012.11.27 2012고단1457

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2012.11.27 2012고단1457

사기

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 28, 2005, the defendant of criminal records was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for ten months for fraud in the Suwon District Court's Ansan Branch for the same year during the execution of punishment in the Chungcheong detention center.

8.12. The same year as paroled;

9. The parole period was set on April 29, 201, and on April 29, 201, the Suwon District Court rendered a two-year suspended sentence of imprisonment for a crime of fraud in Ansan Branch of the same month, which became final and conclusive on the 29th of the same month.

2. Around June 16, 2006, the Defendant, within the “D” office of the 8th floor of the Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building C, intended to manufacture electronic telecommunications and entertainment equipment and recruit scambling stores and sell them. The Defendant currently leased the office, and intended to recruit scambling stores, the Defendant shall take over a corporation with capital of at least 3-50 million won. If the acquisition fund is lent, the Defendant provided that he would complete payment within one month after conducting the business of manufacturing and selling entertainment equipment.

However, even if the Defendant borrowed money from the victim, it was thought that the Defendant would use it for the purchase price of the house that he purchased on his own. In addition, the office that the Defendant leased as the head office of a new place of business at the time also paid 2.5 million won of the down payment out of the deposit 2.5 million won of the down payment, and even if the Defendant received business funds from investors including the victim without any capital, there was a lack of funds to promote the business by using the Defendant’s money to pay the above house purchase price and office deposit, and there is a high possibility that the Defendant’s business that the Defendant intended to promote would also be regulated by illegal adult gambling games that cause money exchange. Accordingly, even if the Defendant borrowed money from the victim, there

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and belongs thereto to the account of the defendant on the same day from the victim.

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 안양지원 2019.11.26 2019고단1252

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.11.23 2016고단3750

-부산지방법원 2013.11.28 2012고단10185

-광주지방법원 목포지원 2015.10.27 2015고단939

-인천지방법원 부천지원 2014.03.12 2013고단2853