logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.02.06 2014고합561
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(뇌물)등
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four years and a fine of thirty thousand won; and

2. The defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bribery) is D by the Korea Land and Housing Corporation (LH Corporation) which is a public corporation under the Act on the Management of Public Institutions.

From June 29, 2007 to January 27, 2009, the Defendant used his position to receive money and valuables from the persons related to the above corporations, on the following grounds: “F Corporation,” which belongs to the Multifunctional City E of the LH Si Special Headquarters and ordered by the Special Headquarters of LH Si Special Headquarters, is in charge of the inspection of the progress of construction, design change, etc.; and “F Corporation,” which is in charge of inspecting the progress of construction, design change, etc., shall be performed on several occasions at the F Corporation site site around the first half of 2008.”

Around June 2008, the Defendant asked H to the effect that “The natural rocks calculated at the Sejong City construction site ordered by the LH Corporation would have been evised, and the said rocks would have been evised, and that H would make money in consultation with the subcontractor for the construction project.”

Therefore, on June 25, 2008, the Defendant received cash of KRW 40 million from H as a case of providing convenience in the process of construction, such as design change and use of natural stone, from the public domain in the outer site of the F-based Construction Site located in Sejong Gyeong-si on July 25, 2008, immediately after the second change of the construction cost in an amount equivalent to KRW 1.34 billion, and received a bribe in relation to the duties of the public corporation employees deemed public officials.

2. Acceptance of bribe;

A. A. Around August 2008, the Defendant of the acceptance of bribe against H was able to increase the construction cost through a change in the design relating to the exchange of the annual base of the section where access roads are installed within the F Corporation site, and H decided to do so.

the same shall apply.

arrow