logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2013.05.23 2013고정64
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

피고인과 피해자 C는 청주시 흥덕구 D 입구에서 떡볶기, 오뎅, 순대 등 분식류를 판매하는 포장마차 노점상을 하면서, 각각 주거지에서 생활하는 자들이다.

At around 10:00 on October 20, 2012, the Defendant, while engaging in a dispute over the street store, was assaulted by the Defendant, such as fating the Defendant’s fat, fating the left shoulder once and twice the chest, etc., which led to the Defendant’s injury requiring medical treatment for about 14 days, such as 14 days, such as 'baturd fatum fatum', fating the Defendant’s fat, pushed down the fat, cutting down the fat, cutting down the fat, and cutting down the body fighting.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness C and F;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. A written diagnosis of injury (investigative records, No. 71);

1. Photographs (which means the 72 pages, 82 pages of investigation records);

1. Application of the video CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant's assertion as to the claim of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act alleged that his act constitutes a legitimate act that does not violate social rules as a passive defensive act. However, according to the evidence of the judgment, the defendant also saw that he saw the victim's bath, dump, and dump and ebbbb, etc., and suffered the above injury because she dump and ebbb, etc. were pushed against the victim's attack. According to the above facts acknowledged, the defendant's crime cannot be viewed as a legitimate act since it does not appear that there was any means or method other than the act.

(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2007Do6243, Dec. 24, 2009). Reasons for sentencing are as follows: (a) the victim first assaults the Defendant for three days from October 19, 2012 or for twenty days from October 19, 2012; and (b) the Defendant needs to receive treatment for twenty days.

arrow