logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.05.17 2016가단49760
공사대금
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. From September 30, 2016, Defendant Western Construction Co., Ltd.: KRW 66,268,448 and its amount.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

(1) The Defendant Plus Complex Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Plus Complex Development”) newly constructed an apartment complex B in Geumcheon-gu, Busan (hereinafter “instant building”). The said new construction (hereinafter “instant new construction”) awarded a contract to Defendant Slus Complex Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Slus Complex Construction”).

B. On February 4, 2015, Defendant Seo Young Construction awarded a subcontract for the construction cost of the interior works of this case to Defendant Bo Young-chul Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Bo Young-chul”) and Defendant A during the construction period from February 15, 2015 to August 30, 2015. Defendant Bo Young-chul and Defendant A paid a subcontract for the construction cost of the interior works of this case to Nonparty C during the construction period of KRW 609,90,000,000, and from April 13, 2015 to August 30, 2015.

Secondly, on July 10, 2015, C renounced the interior construction of this case. On July 14, 2015, the Plaintiff succeeded to the interior construction of this case from C on July 14, 2015, and entered into a sub-subcontract (hereinafter referred to as “the construction contract of this case”) which includes the following contents between Defendant Bonan and A:

① In concluding the interior design of this case in KRW 609,00,000 from Defendant Western Comprehensive Construction, Defendant Bohovah and A shall enter into the contract with the Plaintiff as KRW 428,00,000 (including value-added tax) of the actual cost of the interior design of this case.

② The Plaintiff shall pay KRW 30,000,000 to the Defendant Bohovahovah in terms of the fee for the interior works of the instant case.

③ The Plaintiff shall be paid 60% of the construction cost as a substitute.

x. The Plaintiff completed all the interior design construction in the instant case, and received KRW 80,000,000 from Defendant Bohn-do and A as part of the cost of interior design construction in the instant case.

(v) in addition, in accordance with the terms of the instant construction contract, the Plaintiff is the Defendant.

arrow