logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2019.09.04 2019고단2500
특수공무집행방해등
Text

A person shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than two months and by imprisonment for not more than ten months with prison labor for the crimes of No. 2 and No. 3 of the judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On October 27, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment and 2 years of suspended execution at the Incheon District Court for violating the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on November 4, 2016.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On July 28, 2016, the Defendant made phone calls to the C Administrative Welfare Center located in Jung-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Jung-gu, and repeatedly heard guidance to the effect that “the head of the Dong-gu, 20 years prior to the 20-year period,” and that “the head of the Dong-gu, 20 years prior to the 20-year period,” and that “the head of the Dong-gu, 2000”

At around 15:00 on the same day, the Defendant visited the above welfare center and she saw the above D with a large interest to “this she has taken”, and continued to d's flaps, and d's flaps with flaps.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning civil petition handling affairs by public officials.

2. On January 10, 2019, the Defendant called at the place mentioned at the preceding port at the morning on January 10, 2019, and called “E, who is a public official working at the above welfare center, is aware of why he does not want to find the same, or where there are many talks, but he will be asked to inform other employees of what he would be inside, and he will spathize it,” and “F who is a public official working there is no way to find the same, and if you want to see why he will not find the same, you should stick the knife on his chest, but knife the knife at the chest of the driver.” On the same day, the Defendant again called at the above welfare center at around 17:30 on the same day, requested G to refuse to visit the family and then requested the public official who is working at the above welfare center to give him to her, and then he would not cause any danger to the public official’s death.”

In this respect, the defendant is justified in treating civil petitions by public officials.

arrow