The defendant shall be innocent.

At around 21:10 on December 10, 2013, the Defendant threatened the victim E (the age of 62) who was taking meals with the representative officers of the apartment occupant in the D restaurant of Cheongju-gu, Cheongju-si, 202, Cheongju-gu, Cheongju-si, by walking a phone to the victim, and by stating that “this dog, Chewing, swel, swelth, and sweld, sweld, sweld.”

Facts of recognition

Witness

According to the E’s partial statement, each police interrogation protocol against the defendant, the police protocol against F, and the accusation protocol (including attached documents), the following facts can be acknowledged:

E is the chairman of the council of occupants' representatives, and the defendant is the director of the management office of the apartment of this case.

The apartment occupants of this case requested the dismissal of the chairperson E to the election commission, and the procedure related thereto was in progress. On September 2013, E sent official documents to the above chairperson, who requested the analysis of 20 employees to save personnel expenses, and notified the controlled entity of the purport that "the contract is terminated on December 2013" to the Defendant during November 201, 2013.

On December 10, 2013, E posted a public notice on the bulletin board of each of the instant apartment units, stating that “The Defendant, who has reached the retirement age on April 2013, 2013, had been maintained by the end of December 2013 at the request of the management office. The president of the council of occupants’ representatives, who is unable to participate in the personnel management affairs of controlled entities, but whose employees are employed, shall not be a academic year, delay, or connection, but a person who has wasted the budget only, considered that it is not necessary for the apartment, and a public notice to require the suspension of the procedure for dismissal to the election commission

(7,8 pages) Upon receipt of the notice of de facto dismissal, the defendant, who is not adequate to appraise E, will report the above notice to him as "a person who has been employed as a ‘person who has wasted only in the budget'.