A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and C attempted to steals the work of C at the D convenience store, and to steals the goods in other convenience stores without the owner of the business.

On June 23, 2015, at the D convenience point operated by the Victim F in Osan-si E around 02:45 on June 23, 2015, the Defendant taken up one direction indicator within the victim’s jobs, and one life tree within the convenience point.

In other words, it shows to C who is working in the seat c, and there was a difference between 1 and 1 of tobacco.

C In this regard, the defendant does not take out 1 A of tobacco.

At the same time, the defendant allowed him to leave the above objects with the above objects.

As a result, the Defendant, in collusion with C, stolen 1, 1, 1, and 1, in collusion with C, and stolen the property owned by the victim at a total of five times from around that time to June 25, 2015, the market price of which is equivalent to 200,000 won, such as the list of crimes in attached Form.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect C by the police;

1. Application of the law of the police statement protocol to F;

1. Article 331 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (including the cases of minor damage and the cases of a full agreement with the victim) of the mitigated amount;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds that Article 62 (1) (recognisive Grounds for Reduction of Amount) of the Criminal Act is higher than that of the suspended sentence;