logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2013.12.20 2013고단6665
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

The summary of the facts charged of this case is that "the employee of the defendant violated the restriction on vehicle operation on the roads front of the Gyeongsan Business Office on April 8, 2002 in relation to the defendant's business."

However, the effect of Articles 86, 83(1)2 and 54(1) of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005), which is the applicable provisions of the facts charged, was retroactively lost pursuant to the Constitutional Court Order 2010Hun-Ga38 of Oct. 28, 2010 and the proviso of Article 47(2) of the Constitutional Court Act.

Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow