The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant does not have any misunderstanding of facts against the victim’s her butt.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (fine 2,00,000,000 and 40 hours’ order to complete a program) is too unreasonable.

2. Judgment on the assertion of mistake of facts

A. According to the evidence in the judgment below, the court below found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case, based on the following: (a) the Defendant’s son’s her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

B. In addition to the judgment of the court below's conviction, the following circumstances acknowledged by the record, namely, the defendant moved to another person without a natural movement at the time of the instant case, and the defendant does not seem to have any movement to the left hand until the victim is injured, immediately after the victim's back, left her hand over her hand, and her part of correction power is measured as 0.6, the defendant seems to have no big problem in walking and visual view, and the defendant's her part of correction power is sufficiently recognized, so the judgment of the court below is just, and the defendant's her part of correction power is not accepted. Accordingly, the defendant's assertion of mistake of facts is not accepted.

3. The Defendant’s assertion of unfair sentencing is a favorable circumstance to the Defendant that has no record of criminal punishment.

그러나 한편, 이 사건 범행은 피고인이 대형서점에서 일하는 점원인 피해자를 불시에 추행한 것으로 범행 경위나 수법, 추행의 정도 등에 비추어 그 죄질이 나쁠 뿐만 아니라, 피고인은 당심에 이르기까지도 변명으로 일관하며...