A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, from around May 2007, was practically operating the “E Child Care Center” located in Cheongyang-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and became the president on May 2010.

No person shall receive any subsidy or divert any subsidy by fraud or other improper means.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, who has a child care teacher license, filed a false report on appointment and dismissal as a child care teacher after obtaining a child care teacher license from F, G, H, I, J, K, K, L, etc., and filed a false claim for personnel expenses for infant care teachers M, N,O, P, Q, R, and S (special allowances for infant care teachers in rural areas, personnel expenses for extended hours, expenses for improving the working environment of teachers, expenses for improving the working environment of teachers, and expenses for improving the treatment of infant care teachers) who do not meet the criteria for the payment of infant care teachers by the health and welfare division and the Chungcheongnam-do Infant Care Project.

In addition, despite the fact that 11 children such as Korea and Japan do not actually extend the number of hours, they had the parents of the relevant children to receive childcare fees by manipulating the relevant documents as if they had extended the number of hours.

1. Around August 2009, the Defendant received subsidies due to false report of infant care teachers: (a) on the basis of the foregoing E-care center, the Defendant borrowed the F’s certificate of infant care teachers and relevant documents from F; (b) on the basis of such documents, F, as if the F actually worked in the E-care center as an infant care teacher; (c) applied for special allowances for infant care teachers to F, working environment improvement expenses, and personnel expenses for infant care teachers; and (d) by deceiving the person in charge of the Cheongyang-gun Office in the manner of applying for personnel expenses for infant care teachers; and (c) then, the Defendant received subsidies of KRW 15,570,000 from the Cheongyang-gun National Treasury to the operation account of the child care center from April 30, 2014 from that time to that of the attached list of crimes (1).