1. The part on the ship (A) which connects each point of the attached Form 1 through 26, and 1 among the area of 2,400 square meters prior to the smuggling-si I in sequence is 2.

With respect to 2,400 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”), the Plaintiff owned 221/242 shares, the Defendants owned 21/242 shares, and the fact that the agreement on the method of dividing the instant land between the Plaintiff and the Defendants was not reached by the closing date of the pleadings of the instant case, or that the agreement on the method of dividing the instant land between the Plaintiff and the Defendants was not reached by the parties, may be acknowledged by the purport of the entry in the evidence Nos. 1 and 2 and the entire pleadings

According to the above facts, the Plaintiff, a co-owner of the land of this case, may request the Defendants, other co-owners, to divide the land of this case pursuant to Article 269(1) of the Civil Act.

As to the method of partition, the plaintiffs wish to divide the land of this case as stated in the Disposition No. 1, and considering all the circumstances, such as the result of surveying and appraising the land of this case and the present utilization status, which are acknowledged by the overall purport of pleadings and the result of surveying and appraising the land of this case as well as the fact that the defendants explicitly consented to or do not raise any objection to the plaintiff's assertion, it is reasonable to divide the land of this case in kind as stated in the Disposition No.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the same reasons above.