beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is a company that produces digital power devices of the water distribution team and the electric power system as an affiliate of the Gwangju SPS Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “BS”) and the Defendant is a company that produces and supplies the power facilities.
B. Around December 1, 2015, the Defendant requested the Defendant to submit bid-related data in order to select a bid for the supply of “electric power conversion facilities for building solar power generation systems in one set of the Republic of Korea,” which is ordered by the Korea-Japan KRN Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Korea-Japan”). Around December 1, 2015, the Defendant provided a written estimate and a letter of intent to set the price per the NAU as KRW 12,300,000 for the NAU, and the Defendant was selected as a successful bidder as a result of the bid and entered into a contract with the Korea-Japan on December 23, 2012.
C. On February 1, 2016, the Defendant sent a written estimate of KRW 12,30,000 per unit price, and the number of 28 units of supply to MaU Mazz. On April 29, 2016, the Defendant supplied KRW 15,65,000 per unit price to the Plaintiff on April 29, 2016; the payment period shall be 15,65,000 won per unit price; and the payment period shall be 9,00 July 30, 2016;
9. A written order issued on November 25, 201 of the same year was sent. On May 10, 2016, the Plaintiff supplied 12.3 million won per unit price to the Defendant on May 10, 2016, but the payment period was July 15, 2016.
9. It sent an order with the content as of November 15, 199 and as of November 10 of the same year.
On June 1, 2016, the Defendant sent a e-mail to the luminous Development Agency that it is no longer difficult to proceed due to the lack of development human resources.
E. Around July 5, 2016, the U.S. investigation was changed from the Defendant to LSS. Around December 2, 2012, the Plaintiff claimed KRW 186,042,710 as damages equivalent to the additional cost incurred from the alteration of the RMU’s investigation. On December 2, 2016, the Plaintiff agreed to KRW 100,000,000 on December 29, 2016, to compensate for damages between luminous and luminous places.