1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B shall pay KRW 7,134,669 and KRW 3,423,980 among them from October 27, 2014 to the day of full payment.

1. Claim against Defendant B and C

A. The facts of recognition 1) The Network G obtained respectively loans of KRW 1,30,00 on April 28, 2001, KRW 20,000 on August 16, 2001, KRW 3,000 on December 17, 2001, KRW 8,600,000 on December 17, 2001, ④ KRW 10,000,00 on December 17, 2001, and at that time, the Plaintiff provided credit guarantee for the principal and interest obligation of the network G. (2) The heir died on March 1, 2003, and the heir is a child, KRW 1/7,00 on inheritance.

On the other hand, the deceased I died on April 30, 2008, and his inheritor was Defendant B (the wife 3/49), Defendant C (the inheritance by representation 2/49), Defendant C (the inheritance by representation 2/49), and Defendant D (the inheritance by representation 2/49).

3) The deceased G and its inheritors failed to pay the principal and interest of loan stated in Paragraph 1, and the Defendant subrogated to KRW 5,925,022 on March 29, 2007.

As of October 26, 2014, the interest and interest on the subrogation as of October 26, 2014 is KRW 116,532,953 and the interest on delay interest rate is 12% per annum.

【Ground for recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, each entry of Gap's 1 through 9 (including virtual numbers), and the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the facts found in the determination as to the cause of the claim, Defendant B is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff damages for delay calculated at the rate of 12% per annum from October 27, 2014 to the day of full payment, Defendant C is obligated to pay damages for delay calculated at the rate of 12% per annum for the Plaintiff’s KRW 7,134,69 (116,532,953 x 3/49 x 3/49) and 2,282,654 x 55,022 x 2/49) among them (5,925,022 x 3/49 x 3/49).

C. Although the above Defendants asserted that they cannot respond to the Plaintiff’s claim because they were responsible for both L with respect to Defendant B and C’s assertion, they cannot oppose the Plaintiff on the sole ground of such assertion. Therefore, the above assertion cannot be accepted.

2. Claim against Defendant D and F

(a) Indication of claims: To be as shown in the reasons for the claims;

(b) Judgment on deemed confession (Article 208 (3) 2 and Article 150 (3) of the Civil Procedure Act);

3. Claim against Defendant E.