logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.01.17 2017고정1134
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who drives a cargo vehicle of one ton of C.

1. On July 18, 2017, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) driven the said vehicle while under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.059% (including the foregoing dmark calculation formula) in blood transfusions, and driven the said vehicle at a speed of the speed of the city, depending on the two-lanes from the side of the e-lane, the two-lanes in front of the E-cafeteria in the e-lane in the e-mail in the e-mail.

Since there is an intersection where signal lights are installed, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to reduce speed and accurately operate the steering direction and brake system, to live well on the right and the right and the right, and to drive safely in accordance with the signals.

Nevertheless, while the Defendant is proceeding with a stop signal, the Defendant received the front part of the G Switzerland car driving in front of the right side of the G Switzerland driven by the Defendant FF (26 e.g., in front of the left side of the above vehicle of the Defendant.

The Defendant, by negligence in the above occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim F, who is the driver of the above-victimed vehicle, such as clocks, tensions, etc., requiring approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and suffered injury to the victim H (28 Doe) who is the flick, in an open form requiring approximately three weeks of medical treatment.

2. Although the Defendant was prohibited from driving a motor vehicle, etc. while driving a motor vehicle in violation of the Road Traffic Act (breathing), the Defendant driven the motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol of approximately 17 km amounting to 0.059% of alcohol content in blood (including the aforementioned dmark calculation formula) from the fright apartment in the Go-gu, Ansan-si to the place indicated in the preceding paragraph.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A statement prepared by the F;

1. Each written diagnosis of F and H:

1. Any report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, report on the circumstances of the driver at home and report on internal investigation (the foregoing dmark calculation formula);

1. The scene of the accident, and

arrow