A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 14, 2014, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million by the Seoul Central District Court for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act.

On April 21, 2020, at Seocho-gu Seoul, the Defendant was demanded to respond to a drinking test by inserting the whole breath of five times between around 00:36 on April 21, 2020 and around 01:11 on the same day, on the grounds that there are reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol, such as drinking alcohol, drinking alcohol, drinking alcohol, drinking alcohol, snife, e, the D Racing of the Seoul Coast Guard Station E, and reaction to drinking alcohol reduction.

그럼에도 피고인은 음주측정기에 입김을 불어 넣는 시늉만 하는 방법으로 이를 회피하여 정당한 사유 없이 경찰공무원의 음주측정요구에 응하지 아니하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Accident video CDs;

1. Criminal history records, the defendant and his defense counsel acknowledged the fact that the defendant was not bona fide in the measurement of drinking at first time, but thereafter they followed the measurement of drinking in good faith, so they do not refuse the measurement of drinking.

호흡측정기에 의한 음주측정은 운전자가 호흡측정기에 숨을 세게 불어넣는 방식으로 행하여지는 것으로서 여기에는 운전자의 자발적인 협조가 필수적이라 할 것이므로, 운전자가 경찰공무원으로부터 음주측정을 요구받고 호흡측정기에 숨을 내쉬는 시늉만 하는 등 형식적으로 음주측정에 응하였을 뿐 경찰공무원의 거듭된 요구에도 불구하고 호흡측정기에 음주측정수치가 나타날 정도로 숨을 제대로 불어넣지 아니하였다면 이는 실질적으로 음주측정에 불응한 것과 다를 바 없다

and without any justifiable reason, the driver.