Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, he shall be 100.

Punishment of the crime

No person shall transfer any access medium in using and managing the access medium.

On June 2016, the Defendant transferred cash cards, etc., which are access media connected to the new bank account (D) in the name of the Defendant at the first floor of the C Building at the end of Jeonju City, to the numberless vehicle operator who sent by the numberless winners of the name.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The written statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A report on internal investigation (in cases of attaching a certificate of deposit money);

1. Application of statutes, such as an application for transaction details;

1. Article 49 (4) 1 and Article 6 (3) 1 of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions for the crime;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The defendant guilty of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order is merely a delegation of the authority to hear the words of lending money to the defendant by means of the defendant's cash card from a person who is not his/her name and to delegate his/her right to access media temporarily, and the transfer of the right has not been made.

The charges are denied by asserting that they are facts charged.

However, each of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence in its holding, namely, ① the Defendant was seeking to obtain a loan at the time, but the Defendant was unable to obtain a loan due to low credit rating, but, on June 2016, the Defendant transferred the Defendant’s cash card, etc. to the Defendant’s driver of a de facto multi-use vehicle who sent his/her name name to the Defendant by putting his/her phone at a phone and obtaining a loan by raising his/her credit rating and obtaining a loan.

Although the defendant, who was aware of the loan, was allowed to borrow the loan from his name due to the infinite contact, he did not confirm his name, address, occupation, contact address, etc. and transferred the cash card, etc. without confirming his identity. ② At the time, the defendant was infinite.