logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2019.03.28 2018구단77190
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on October 13, 2016 with the status of stay C-3 (short-term visit) of the Republic of Ghana (the Republic of Korea, hereinafter “A”), which is a national of the Republic of Ghana.

B. On October 28, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an application for recognition of refugee status with the Defendant, but on January 15, 2018, the Defendant rendered a disposition for recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that it is difficult to recognize “profuges with sufficient grounds for fear of persecution” as stipulated in Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Convention”) and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”) and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees.

C. On February 9, 2018, the Plaintiff dissatisfied with the instant disposition and filed an objection with the Minister of Justice, but the Minister of Justice dismissed the Plaintiff’s objection on the same ground as on September 14, 2018.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 3, Eul evidence 1 to 4, and the purport of whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's assertion is a mother-to-sofrier who had resided in the village B at the city of Aa or Choti (Ejisu).

Since the Catus Catus has broad farmland, many people in the north side area of Aatus have moved to work for farming. At present, more people have moved to the north side area than those living in the Catus State of Catus than those living in the original Cat.

However, people in the North Korean region are married with a woman who is born by his/her father and married with a woman who is aged.

On January 2016, the Plaintiff considered such a culture is not good and demanded to stop such malicious behavior to eight village sources, and the complaint was filed from four village sources and ten to fifteen North Korean village areas.

arrow