Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 800,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant visited the Korean Racing Association C as a customer, and the victim D is the Korean Marte Association C Harba in Korea.

The Defendant, around December 27, 2014, at the entrance of the third floor E-building C of Gangnam-gu, the third floor of the E-building in Gangnam-gu, where the victim could have access to the Defendant, based on the evidence of admission tickets that the victim could have access to the Defendant, recognized that the Defendant demanded the confirmation of admission tickets that are not the victim’s right,

확인을 요구한다는 이유로, 오른손 주먹으로 피해자의 왼쪽 빰을 1회 가격하는 등 폭행을 하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (Hearing statements by shots);

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. At the time of the instant case, the Defendant was in a state of mental and physical disability due to a disability in appraisal adjustment following cerebrovascular disease.

2. According to the records, the defendant was hospitalized in a convalescent hospital from August 2010 to July 201, 201 after being hospitalized in a convalescent hospital due to cerebrovascular in 2005 and 2010. Although there is an opinion that there exists a decline in recognition function and shock that occurred after probaing the probacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacacaca under the opinion of the Samsung Seoul Hospital, each of the above evidence and other circumstances acknowledged by the prosecutor, namely, the defendant alleged that the defendant was in relation to possession of admission tickets with the victim at the time of the instant crime, the details that the defendant stated in relation to his action